You already pay for SAST, DAST, and dependency scanning, and the value now depends on the rule that ranks what they find. Relevant Software writes that rule, sequences the plan your engineers execute, and merges the first gates, so a release stops where it should.
Your pipeline earns a measured baseline before anyone buys another tool: which controls run today, which ones hold under a real release, and what the distance between them costs.
Sequencing decides whether a plan survives contact with a release calendar, and this work orders the controls so the cheap, high-coverage ones land before the expensive ones.
Requirements, design review, and code review carry security decisions long before a pipeline runs, and this engagement puts those decisions in writing.
Build systems hold production credentials, sign artifacts, and reach every environment you run, so the pipeline earns the same review your applications get. Findings from penetration testing feed the same gate list, so an exploitable path closes inside the pipeline that shipped it.
Tool decisions bind a team for years, so this work runs them as a comparison your engineers can defend: coverage against your languages, noise against your triage capacity, and cost against your build volume.
Third-party packages, base images, and build plugins make up most of what you ship, and each one earns provenance you can show.
The roadmap hands your team a build order, and our engineers can carry it out. Extending the engagement into our DevSecOps services puts each control into your build, your registry, and your infrastructure in the order the plan sets.
Our AI security services handle the red teaming your LLMs and agents, engineering the guardrails, and wiring evaluation checks into the same pipeline.
Every repository, runner, credential, registry, and deploy path reaches one diagram in the first week. Your team keeps that map whether the engagement continues or stops there.
Controls get measured against how a real release behaves, and the ranked gap list gives your leads one agreed view of where the program stands today.
Severity thresholds, reachability rules, and the exception path arrive in writing while changing them still costs nothing. Your security and delivery leads approve it together.
Controls arrive mapped to the named requirement each one satisfies, with the retest attached. Where a formal certification drives the deadline, our IT compliance work carries the audit preparation and the policy set around it.
ISO 27001 certified, GDPR and HIPAA-aligned delivery. Your procurement and security reviewers receive the certificates and the control evidence on the first pass.
Triage rules written against your own call paths and runtime exposure. Your team works a short list a release genuinely stops for, and the same rule applies to every finding that arrives after we leave.
OWASP SAMM, NIST SSDF, SLSA, and the EU Cyber Resilience Act. Your maturity score and control set map to the standards your auditors and enterprise clients already work from.
96% employee retention. The consultant who writes your gate specification is the engineer who opens the pull request, so the reasoning holds from the assessment through to the last merge.
Up to 50% faster delivery and up to 20% fewer bugs through AI-assisted development, with every change still passing senior code review.
Controls scheduled around your release calendar. Each gate lands in a window your delivery team chose, so the security program and the product roadmap keep the same dates.
Four things you can count today set the range:
Two engagement shapes carry the cost from there. A scoped assessment and roadmap runs with senior consultants alongside your team for a few weeks. A dedicated team carries the roadmap through implementation when gates, tooling, and remediation all land in the same quarter. Our team itemizes each variable in the proposal, and the documented roadmap lands within 14 days of kickoff. If your pipelines are numerous enough that counting them is itself the problem, that inventory becomes the first week of work, with nothing to prepare beforehand.
Yes, we can work inside a pipeline your team did not write. The engagement opens by reading the build configuration as it stands: what each job does, which credentials it holds, what it can deploy, and which steps exist only because someone needed them once.
A rebuild enters the conversation in one situation: where the build system itself cannot express the permission boundaries you need, and a runner with unlimited scope cannot be narrowed without replacing it. That case is uncommon, and where it does apply, saying so early costs you less than a year of gates layered onto a foundation that cannot hold them.
Yes, and most programs start that way. One product team, one pipeline, one release train is enough to produce a maturity read, a gate specification, and the first enforcing rule, and that package is what your leadership reviews before anyone signs for the rest.
Pick the pipeline that deploys most often. Frequent releases surface the exception path, the false-positive rate, and the developer reaction within weeks, while a quarterly release hides all three until the decision is already made.
What carries over to the next pipeline is the specification and the triage rule, so each engagement after the first covers more ground for the same effort.
Your tools produce findings. What decides a release is the rule that ranks them, and most teams never wrote one, so severity gets read straight off the scanner and the backlog grows past the point of use.
The work here writes that rule against your own code: whether a vulnerable function sits on a reachable call path, whether the affected service faces the internet, whether the data it touches is customer data. A critical in a dependency your build never loads at runtime ranks below a medium in the authentication path, and once that reasoning is written down, your team applies it without asking anyone.
Three checks you can run this week:
If those questions are hard to answer from your current tooling, our team runs them with you during the assessment.
Every artifact the assessment produces belongs to you: the pipeline map, the maturity score, the ranked gap list, and the gate specification, in formats your team edits without us. Each one is written to stand alone, so it keeps working long after the engagement closes.
We write it as a sequenced plan and merge the first gates so your pipeline proves it.
DevOps
Fintech
DevOps
