
Requirements Definition
You get a PRD that your engineers, designers, and stakeholders can use:
- Feature scope, user flows, acceptance criteria
- Non-functional requirements and constraints
- Out-of-scope items to prevent feature creep
Your scope shifts, roadmap is a guess, engineers are waiting, and nobody can answer what ships first? In 2-3 weeks of AI-powered product discovery with Relevant, you get a PRD, an architecture, a phased delivery plan with a budget, and an interactive prototype.


You get a PRD that your engineers, designers, and stakeholders can use:

You get a clickable front end built on Lovable. The idea becomes a working UI/UX experience in under 48 hours.

Your technical foundation is defined before development starts: models, data flow, integrations, and infrastructure.

We break the build into phased milestones with a clear scope at each stage, so your budget is committed in steps tied to real progress.

We test the idea before development starts, flagging compliance issues, model limits, and delivery risks so nothing surprises you mid-build.

You move into development with a budget you can defend because it is grounded in the architecture.

For startups and small product teams, we build core user flows on top of the validated architecture. For mid-market and enterprise products, we scope working flows as a separate phase based on complexity and team structure.
We run interviews, user research, and competitor analysis to understand what you’re building and who it’s for. AI helps us synthesize conversations and market data, making discovery and deliverables creation up to 2x faster.
You receive a clear PRD: feature scope, user flows, acceptance criteria, non-functional requirements, and a defined out-of-scope list that stops feature creep before it starts.
You get the model choices, data flow, integrations, and infrastructure defined against your locked scope. Tricky integrations get prototyped and feasibility gets stress-tested, so nothing important rests on an assumption.
We break the build into phased milestones, each with a clear scope, timeline, team setup, and budget. You see what ships in the MVP and what comes after.
Before handoff, you get the full plan run through risk and feasibility checks: model accuracy, data availability, compliance constraints (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2), timeline buffers, and cost assumptions. Anything fragile gets flagged with a mitigation path, so you know the risks before you commit a budget.
By the end of week two, you get the full package: PRD, architecture blueprint, delivery roadmap, risk register, and budget. Hand it to your engineering team or move straight into AI-Accelerated MVP with the same team that built the plan.




Our PRDs, architectures, and roadmaps are written by engineers with 13+ years of production software behind them. They survive contact with real development.
The scope we define and the stack we recommend are the ones we’ve shipped across fintech, healthtech, SaaS, and enterprise.
We design for token costs, latency, security and safety guardrails, model performance management, hallucination handling, and data flow, not generic web app patterns retrofitted to AI.
GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2: we map what applies to your product during discovery, along with best security practices. Compliance isn’t a refactor later.
You work with architects, tech leads, and product engineers who’ve made these calls on real products before.
96% retention means no context lost in handoff. The team that defines your scope and architecture can take it straight into MVP.
Your PRD, architecture blueprint, and roadmap are written to the standard that VCs and acquirers expect during technical due diligence.
Verified clients and third-party reviews mean transparency and delivery quality.
Book a call with our experts to discuss your scope, architecture, or delivery roadmap. Get a clear plan before you commit to development.


At Relevant, AI product discovery is a 1–3 week engagement that starts at $7K that turns an unclear AI product idea into a defined implementation plan before development begins.
The goal is to remove ambiguity about scope, stack, and sequencing so engineering teams build the right thing the first time. Our team ensures you walk away with a PRD, an architectural blueprint, a delivery roadmap, a risk register, and a phased budget estimate.
The most common project failures happen at the planning layer: wrong model choice, wrong data assumptions, unscoped compliance requirements, or features that prove infeasible mid-sprint. Discovery costs hours of decision-making. Skipping it pays for those same decisions in weeks of engineering time, usually with code that has to be thrown away.
You receive a complete handoff package:
Every document is written to be executable by any engineering team — yours, ours, or a third party.
Yes, it will. Compliance constraints shape architecture decisions, so we identify what applies to your product during discovery. If your product handles health data, EU user data, or financial information, or operates in a regulated industry, we map the relevant requirements into the architecture blueprint and flag any features that need redesign to remain compliant.
We run feasibility workshops to map your business goals against the features that would actually move them and cut the ones that don’t justify the build cost. For the AI side, we separate what an LLM, RAG system, or agent is genuinely good at from what breaks in production. As a result, you have a prioritized feature list, a clear MVP scope, and the features we recommend cutting because their costs or risks outweigh their value.
We adjust the process. Instead of starting from a blank canvas, we assess what you’ve built, what’s working, and what’s blocking the next phase. The deliverables stay the same (PRD, architecture, roadmap), but we frame them as an evolution of your current system.
We test the assumptions most likely to break a build before any code is written. Feasibility work covers data availability and quality, model behavior in your actual use case, latency under realistic load, acceptable accuracy thresholds, integration complexity with your existing systems, running costs at scale, and compliance constraints.
If the idea is risky, we flag it before development starts.
Yes, when a prototype answers a question faster than a document. For the appropriate scope, we build either a clickable front-end to test user flows and UX, or a lightweight technical prototype to test architecture or AI behavior against real data.
The purpose is validation, not a finished product. A clickable UI prototype can be ready in under 48 hours and is enough to gather investor or user feedback and confirm the direction before you commit a development budget.
We build a cost model. It accounts for expected user volume, request frequency, token usage per request, storage, third-party API calls, hosting, monitoring, and the headroom you need to scale.
Yes, and usually by more than it costs. Discovery prevents the four most expensive mistakes in AI builds:
A short discovery phase often saves weeks of engineering time by replacing assumptions with decisions.
That is usually the founder or product owner, who owns the vision; a technical stakeholder who understands your systems and constraints; and anyone accountable for compliance, operations, or the customer workflows the product touches.
You own everything we produce, and you have three paths. You can move directly into MVP development with us, hand the documents to your internal team, or take them to a third-party vendor.
We write every deliverable so it can be executed by any engineering team, so you are not locked in. If you continue with Relevant, the discovery cost is deducted from the MVP price because the discovery outputs serve as the foundation for the build.
Yes, and it is a common starting point. We assess the existing foundation and tell you plainly what to keep, what to rebuild, and where the risks sit, with particular attention to security, scalability, and maintainability.
Relevant also offers two dedicated services that can be your next step:
AI
AI
AI