What Is DevSecOps and Why Should You Care About the Security as Code Culture?

Security breaches remain a fixed line item in corporate budgets: IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025 puts the global average cost of a breach at $4.44 million. Behind many incidents sit ordinary mistakes and negligence. You would think software engineers care most about secure coding. But do they? It’s not their primary duty.

Most software developers focus on building products based on requirements, equipping them with the necessary functions, and making them user-friendly. More diligent and experienced engineers will incorporate basic security checks. But, with today’s hackers, “basic” is no longer enough. That’s why we’ll be talking about DevSecOps – security incorporated into the code and carried throughout the entire integration and delivery processes. So, what is DevSecOps, and why should you care? 

What Is DevSecOps? 

Healthcare shows how expensive it gets: IBM’s research puts the average healthcare breach at $7.42 million, the costliest of any industry for years running. The number of mobile apps, embedded devices, and IoT makes secure coding even more critical. 

But, you can’t install an armored door on a cardboard house and hope you’re protected. You should start caring about security as soon as you draw up your house plan. DevSecOps is the methodology to use here. Security as code implies you have predefined security policies that are codified from the beginning of the project and can be repeated and used consistently.

If we just spell it out, the abbreviation stands for development, security, and operations. DevSecOps means the integrity of all three components where security is not solely the responsibility of a security team but a natural complement to every stage of the development lifecycle. It is not only about protection but also about compliance: industries like banking, healthcare, automotive, and more may have specific requirements to code repositories, deployment tools, and beyond. Our overview of cloud security in healthcare shows how strict those requirements get.

Integrating security features once the app is ready for release doesn’t work well with continuous integration and delivery – standard practice these days. With short development cycles, the security as code culture must be built into every level of the DevOps process without influencing the time and cost when you hire app developers. 

Governance

On this level, DevSecOps presupposes building operational and compliance frameworks. Creating understandable metrics to evaluate results is vital as well. Monitoring should be available to all team members. 

People 

No division between development and security teams: when you hire cybersecurity experts, they should be a part of the development and operations teams from the beginning. They must work in synchronization, researching and tracking possible exploits, and fixing them along the development process.

Process 

The company’s responsibility is to ensure the integrated workflow with security automation tools, security telemetry, incident response, integrated backlog, and pipeline. To guarantee compliance and reveal security flaws early on, automated audit evidence collection should be a part of modern cloud-based application development.

Technology

Security control has to be embedded early in the infrastructure and processes. It starts from the integrated development environment with specific security features and ends with recurring tasks automation.

Essentially, DevSecOps is a philosophy that ensures security as code culture and integrates security into all DevOps processes. At Relevant Software, we follow this philosophy by tracking changes to the infrastructure and code and identifying places where we can add security tests and checks when building products for our clients. The automation of gates and agreement upon an integrated development environment, with specific security features, are vital as well. 

From DevOps to DevSecOps

Since most software development companies have turned to the agile software development team structure, DevOps, with its priority on delivery time, has become a common practice. Via continuous integration, automation, communication, and collaboration, teams gain control over production, and reduce the time to market. 

By adding a security component to this combination, companies increase the level of protection at all stages of the pipeline. As a result, with DevSecOps, we prioritize fast development of a secure codebase. 

When it comes to continuous processes and automation, both DevOps and DevSecOps have similar methodologies, but the latter shifts the focus on security to the earlier stages. Continuous processes in DevSecOps include a feedback loop where software is continually monitored for threats, and all teams dynamically work on improvements. 

As for the automation aspect of DevOps, it is also vital for the security component: it’s applied to compliance monitoring, code review, threat detection, and more. Speaking figuratively, DevSecOps is DevOps in an armored suit, with all team members working together to build it from scratch. 

Why You Need DevSecOps 

Establishing security protocols as the primary ingredient of the development lifecycle allows teams to write secure code from the start instead of adding the security “frosting” at the end. By integrating security early on, companies can:

• detect bugs and vulnerabilities at earlier stages and fix them at a lower cost
• confidently use open-source packages with an automated tool to track harmful components
• save costs on resource management as you are only looking for the tools and approaches that will help design secure software
• prioritize security for developers, increasing their security expertise at the same time
• manage risks and reduce legal liability, standing up to the promise of cybersecurity

While no one can guarantee 100% security of a project, companies should try and take into account as many risks as possible by following the best practices of the DevSecOps methodology. It’s never too early in the SDLC to start implementing the security as code culture.

DevSecOps Steps and Toolset

Let’s move from the theoretical description of what DevSecOps is to its practical implementation into SDLC. Basically, the task is to ensure that security experts understand how developers work and help them build the necessary control into SDLC.

“Security as code is really about making security more transparent, to work with developers, and speak the same language. We really need to give them the tools and the security policies so they know what to do and can do it themselves.”

Francois Raynaud, founder, DevSecCon

So, how do you implement DevSecOps?

1. Automate static and dynamic analysis, and penetration testing to be able to reuse it across all environments. 
2. Create a continuous feedback loop to allow developers to fix issues and learn the best security practices while coding.
3. Monitor automated security policies and ensure sensitive data is protected. 
4. Test on every code commit and within a staging environment.
5. Automatically create logs during continuous security monitoring. 

Let’s dig even deeper into the SDLC stages to understand what security checks are needed and where they should be added along the way. 

Pre-Commit

Before any software changes are added to the repository, additional security checks should be introduced at this stage:

• lightweight iterative application threat modeling 
• static analysis checking (SAST) with tools like SonarQube, Semgrep, or OpenText Fortify
• peer code review

It’s best to look at the design from the attacker’s perspective, searching for any gaps or vulnerabilities. For this, we suggest using an automated risk questionnaire, similar to what PayPal teams use. The initial point of assessment is whether you use existing languages and frameworks, or experiment with new tech and tools. For code review, it’s ideal to use tools like Gerrit, Phabricator, or Atlassian Crucible. 

Continuous Integration

On the commit stage, you have to build and perform basic testing to determine whether the changes you introduced have broken the entire system or not. What should be included at this stage?

• software component analysis (SCA) to identify risks in third-party components
• incremental SAST
• unit/functional testing of security functions
• alerts on high-risk code changes

You most certainly use open source code, and it has to be reviewed with no exceptions – a record 48,000+ CVEs were published in 2025, roughly 131 every day. To review your code automatically, you can use SCA tools from OWASP, Veracode, or Sonatype. These tools can be wired into your pipelines. For Docker containers scanning, use tools like OpenSCAP or solutions from Twistlock, FlawCheck, etc. 

Acceptance 

The next level is triggered by the success of the previous commit stage. In this area, security control includes:

• automated configuration management and provisioning of the runtime environment: tools to use are Ansible, Puppet, Salt, Docker
• smoke tests to reveal bugs in configuration or deployment
• targeted dynamic testing (DAST) – while the DAST tools don’t always work nicely in CI/CD, you can try using OWASP ZAP with a wrapper like ZAProxy Jenkins plug-in, for instance
• functional and integration testing
• automated security attacks with the help of Gauntlt, Mittn, or BDD-Security
• fuzzing – reliability testing where you inject random data into an API or file to cause errors intentionally; critical for embedded systems development 
• manual pen testing

Don’t forget to tune DAST tools to minimize false positives and remove duplicate findings after the scan (use Code Dx or ThreadFix for this). We recommend running a dynamic scanning in parallel with other tests, or complete it out of band to save time. 

As for the functional and integration testing, developers must focus on misuse cases and “abuser” stories, i.e., write negative tests, which prove that unauthorized users cannot abuse certain features, access admin functions, tamper with data, etc. It is also wise to use manual penetration testing to validate your security program and satisfy compliance requirements. Bug bounties are common among top tech companies like Google, PayPal, or Netflix, so why not follow their example?

Production and Post-Deployment

If the change you’re introducing to your system passes all the previous checks and tests, it’s ready for production deployment. Here, we implement the following security checks: 

• configuration management and provisioning of the runtime environment
• post-deployment smoke tests
• compliance checks – check out the Simian Army, Netflix’s now-archived set of automated runtime checks that inspired many successors. A similar tool is Amazon Inspector
• production monitoring
• runtime defense – an attack-driven defense approach helps to understand and prioritize threats
• red teaming
• bug bounties

With the help of tools like Puppet, Chef, and Ansible, you can set up standardized configurations across multiple servers, minimizing the differences between production, test, and development environments. 

These code-driven configuration management tools also automatically audit runtime configurations, issue alerts when something is missing, and can correct the problem. Cloud security protection solutions like Alert Logic, CloudPassage Halo, Illumio, Threat Stack, and others, offer Chef and Puppet integration. 

Runtime Application Security Protection (RASP) is another runtime protection technology, with tools like Immunio, Waratek, Prevoty, and Contrast Security. There are also innovative approaches to runtime defense – tCell and Twistlock. 

How Relevant Implements Secure DevOps

The security as code culture is at the core of our software development routine. For example, we have been creating software for FirstHomeCoach – a UK-based fintech company that required advanced protection for customers’ sensitive data. User data, gathered by the system, had to be secured with the help of a security-driven architecture and data segregation. DevSecOps was the best methodology to use for this scenario. 

Along with server-side development, the Relevant team took the following security measures:

• security assessment: we performed functional, integration, confirmation, and regression testing to ensure IT infrastructure security
• penetration testing: we used grey-box penetration testing to detect everything left after the automated source code scanning and manual checks
• static code security analysis: automatic detection and location of security loopholes in the source code

What are DevSecOps Success Factors? 

Considering our experience in DevSecOps, we can define the top factors that influence this methodology’s outcome:

• open collaboration and shared metrics to measure success
• self-service security capabilities and “guardrails”
• automated recurring tasks, embedded operational controls, and audits
• a risk-based approach to testing
• a holistic approach to security objectives
• continuous testing, logging, and telemetry

Relevant has the expertise, well-set processes, and tools to build the security as code culture. We can help startups stand against cyberattacks, prevent data leaks in cloud platforms, secure apps from penetration, and assess a project’s level of vulnerability. As AI features enter production apps, LLM security joins that checklist.

Our cybersecurity services allow us to provide our customers with security in development, deployment, production, and the cloud. So, if you need help implementing DevSecOps, learn more about our DevSecOps services.