Relevant
PWA vs. Native Apps: Which One Should You Choose?

PWA vs. Native Apps: Which One Should You Choose?

  • 8 mins read
Andrew BurakAndrew BurakCEO and Founder at Relevant Software

Android and iOS native apps are known for advanced functionality and exceptional performance. Yet many companies, including Uber and Forbes, run progressive web applications (PWA) instead, and the money follows them: Grand View Research expects the global PWA market to grow from $2.08 billion in 2024 to $21.24 billion by 2033. Given that PWAs are cheaper and faster to develop, are costly native apps worth your attention at all? 

Below, we compare the two across the aspects that matter and show when each app type earns its investment in 2026.

Progressive Web Applications 

Basically, a progressive web application is an accelerated website. Developed with the help of HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and JavaScript frameworks covered in our Angular vs React vs Vue.js comparison, or other web technologies, PWAs look and perform very similarly to mobile applications, but through a browser. And though it sounds like a win-win, let us unpack the key advantages and disadvantages of progressive web applications. 

Pros of PWAs 

  • Compatibility. Since a PWA is accessed via a browser, it runs on any type of OS and mobile device (smartphone or tablet). 
  • Lower costs. Because a progressive web app is still a website, you don’t need a large budget for its development. Due to its compatibility with any platform, a PWA is developed once, meaning you’ll need only one dedicated development team
  • URL access. You don’t have to download and install a PWA to start using it. You only need to access it via a browser, then pin it on your home screen to have it always on hand. Besides, like any website, a PWA can be shared through a short URL.
  • SEO benefits. Technically, a PWA is a website. To this end, instead of launching a marketing campaign, you can rely on SEO benefits for its promotion. Plus, due to Google’s mobile-first indexation policy, your app will be given a higher ranking. 
  • Memory-friendly. Since a progressive web app is not downloadable, it needs only a small amount of memory. 
  • User engagement. Though it is no more than a tweaked website, a PWA keeps users engaged with push notifications.
  • App-like UX/UI. A progressive web app feels like a native one. 
  • Updates. A PWA updates without the user clicking any buttons — all new features are available automatically. 

Cons of PWAs 

  • Battery consumption. A progressive web application needs Internet access; that’s why it drains the battery pretty fast. Another reason for excess battery consumption is that PWAs run on technologies that aren’t intended for the mobile environment. As a result, devices need to work harder to interpret the code. 
  • Limited functionality. Since PWAs are Google’s “brainchild,” be prepared that iOS does not support all its features. 
  • Limited hardware access. Such apps have limited access to software and hardware features. For instance, they do not support features that are not maintained by HTML5. On iOS, support has improved (installed PWAs get web push since iOS 16.4, and WebAuthn passkeys can use Face ID or Touch ID), but PWAs still can’t reach Siri, ARKit, in-app purchases, and other core Apple features. 

[e-book id=”6910″]

Native Applications 

Unlike PWAs, native or mobile apps are developed for a specific OS and offer a broader scope of features. Using the hardware and software capabilities of a device, native apps provide stellar performance and smooth customer experience. Nevertheless, many businesses prefer PWAs. Why? Let’s explore their pros and cons. 

Pros of Native Applications

  • Performance. True to its name, a native app is developed using a native language of the device. This means while offering high speed and a wide range of sophisticated features, mobile applications do not consume much battery power. In fact, stellar performance is the main reason why many businesses prefer native apps to their progressive web counterparts.
  • The best UX/UI experience. Attractive and intuitive layouts, vivid animations, smooth scrolling, and many more are critical ingredients of the “native look and feel.” 
  • Full access to hardware aspects. Unlike PWAs, mobile applications have full access to the built-in features of mobile devices, such as GPS, camera, Bluetooth, contact list, microphone, NFC, accelerometer, and player. 
  • Offline mode. Due to the local storage and smooth data synchronization with the cloud, a mobile application can function properly in an offline mode. Such apps typically cache data when the connection is there.
  • Data protection and security. Since native apps have full access to hardware components, they are better at security and data protection. For example, two-factor authentication is possible with native apps.

Cons of Native Applications 

  • Higher costs. Since a native application is created specifically for a particular OS, you’ll need to hire app developers and build a separate agile software development team structure for each platform. Thus, you’ll need to hire Android app developers for an Android app while an iOS version will require you to hire iOS app developers. At the same time, you can hire a team of React Native developers to create a hybrid application, able to work on both platforms. However, keep in mind that a hybrid app is not the same thing as a native, despite its similarity to the latter. 
  • Installation process. It takes more than clicking on the provided link to start using a native app. A user should visit an app store, find the app, download it, and go through the installation process. This process takes effort, which is why many users prefer a brand’s website or web app for shopping or browsing instead of downloading another app. 
  • Promotion costs. Since you can’t use the power of SEO with mobile apps, they require additional promotion in the app stores. 
  • Memory consumption. One of the key disadvantages of mobile apps is that they take up significant storage. Popular consumer apps often exceed 100 MB, while a PWA typically needs only a few megabytes. The exact footprint varies by app type. 

Read also how to hire React Native developers.

PWA vs. Native Apps: Comparison

Now that you know the main advantages and disadvantages of each app type, let’s summarize our findings to see which one better suits you: 

PWANative app
UX/UIlooks and feels like a native appfamous for appealing layouts, intuitive interfaces, and stellar performance
Compatibility works on any platform and mobile device designed for one OS platform only, dependent on new OS versions 
Development costsone development team is enough separate development for each platform is required
Time-to-marketquicker to create longer to create, verification from app stores is required 
Shareabilitycan be shared through a brief URL-linkcan be accessed via app store only 
PromotionSEO-friendlyadditional promotion is required
Offline modeoffers limited functionality in the offline modeworks properly in the offline mode
Memory consumptiondoes not require much RAMrequires a lot of memory storage
Push notificationsavailable; on iOS from version 16.4 for installed PWAsavailable both for Android and iOS
Updatesupdates are carried out automaticallyupdates are carried out manually
Battery consumptiondrains the batterydoes not consume much battery life
Security offers HTTPS encryptionimplements additional security layers with the help of built-in device components
Hardware accesslacks full access to hardware componentshas full access to hardware components
Installationno installation, but can be added to the home screeninstallation is required
Inter-app communicationnot available available

PWA vs. Native apps: When to Use Each App Type?

As shown in the comparison table, a progressive web app won’t replace a native app, despite all the advantages of the former. Still, in some business cases, there is no need to pay more. Having a robust PWA is more than enough. These cases include the following: 

  • You are looking to reach a large audience, but your budget doesn’t allow you to develop a separate app for each platform.
  • The functionality of the expected app doesn’t require hardware elements, which are not supported by PWAs.
  • Push notifications are not your priority, and there are other ways to keep your audience engaged.
  • The functionality of the expected app does not comply with the application store policy.

If your case didn’t make the list, a native mobile app is exactly what you need. That is the usual route for regulated, feature-heavy products such as healthcare app development. Now, let’s explore business cases requiring a native app:

  • Your app requires tight integration with hardware elements.
  • Push notifications are required both for Android and iOS.
  • Biometric authentication is a must.
  • It is a game or an AR solution.

Summary

Despite being similar at first glance, progressive web and native apps are suited for different business cases. As shown in the article, the main difference lies in the fact they’re based on different technologies and show different levels of integration with hardware elements. These differences lead to discrepancies in their compatibility, shareability, promotional peculiarities, and other aspects. 

With all the explanations at hand, you might find it easier to choose and even outline your development approach. For a concrete walk-through of these tradeoffs in fintech, see our guide on how to create an investing app. However, keep in mind you might be lacking some important aspects. And if you have an idea associated with progressive web or native apps, please don’t hesitate to contact us — Relevant Software will help you make the right choice.

Written by
AuthorAndrew BurakCEO and Founder at Relevant Software
Andrew Burak is the CEO and founder of Relevant Software. With a rich background in IT project management and business, Andrew founded Relevant Software in 2013, driven by a passion for technology and a dream of creating digital products that would be used by millions of people worldwide. Andrew's approach to business is characterized by a refusal to settle for average. He constantly pushes the boundaries of what is possible, striving to achieve exceptional results that will have a significant impact on the world of technology. Under Andrew's leadership, Relevant Software has established itself as a trusted partner in the creation and delivery of digital products, serving a wide range of clients, from Fortune 500 companies to promising startups. Andrew holds a master’s degree in Computer Science, specializing in Information Control Systems and Technologies. He also holds certifications in Financial Management, People Management, and Business Development in IT. His expertise spans top industries and technologies, including Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare, Fintech, IoT, and IT Outsourcing Services. This strong foundation enables him to drive innovative solutions and deliver exceptional value to clients across diverse domains.

Results we've delivered

Related articles

Let’s talk about your project

Optional
Optional

By sending a message you agree with your information being stored by us in relation to dealing with your enquiry.
Please have a look at our Privacy Policy.